= Er is sterk positief bewijs | = Er is geen, te weinig, zwak, sterk neutraal en/of tegenstrijdig bewijs | = Er is sterk negatief bewijs | |||
Klik op de links voor meer uitleg, conclusies van de auteurs, gebruikte literatuur en methodologische kwaliteit van de literatuur |
Zoekstrategie Cluster van Wainner
Databanken |
Gebruikte trefwoorden |
Aantal hits |
Relevante hits |
Pubmed |
Cluster Wainner |
2 |
1 |
Clinical prediction rule cervical radiculopathie |
20 |
- |
|
Cervical radiculopathie AND Wainner |
3 |
2 |
|
Radicular symptoms AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Cochrane |
Cluster Wainner |
- |
- |
Clinical prediction rule cervical radiculopathie |
- |
- |
|
Cervical radiculopathie AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Radicular symptoms AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Pedro |
Cluster Wainner |
- |
- |
Clinical prediction rule cervical radiculopathie |
1 |
- |
|
Cervical radiculopathie AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Radicular symptoms AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Medline |
Cluster Wainner |
- |
- |
Clinical prediction rule cervical radiculopathie |
- |
- |
|
Cervical radiculopathie AND Wainner |
- |
- |
|
Radicular symptoms AND Wainner |
- |
- |
Referenties
1 Robert S. Wainner et al. (2003) reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopaty, spine vol 28 No 1 pp. 52-62 2003
2 Robert S. Wainner et al. (2000) Diagnosis and nonoperative management of cervical radiculopathy, Journal of orthopedic & sports physical therapy 30(12): 728-744